Gottfried:
Gottfried’s audience was high school educators, specifically ELA teachers. In my personal opinion, Gottfried’s site was very text heavy and at times perhaps even overwhelming. It was clear that like myself, Gottfried has evolved her driving question throughout the program. In that regard, I can appreciate the difficulty of communicating a concept that has shifted over time. I would say, considering who her audience is, that Gottfried did a solid job in reaching her audience. Dearborn: Dearborn’s audience was primarily elementary teachers in need of technological support. For many teachers, technology can be intimidating considering how comfortable our young students tend to be. Dearborn implemented a combination of text and images as a means of effectively reaching her audience. Perhaps one of her best decisions was including not only student samples, but surveys of her fellow educators. Ultimately, I would argue that Dearborn did a more than sufficient job in addressing her audience. Saslow: Saslow’s audience was also high school educators, specifically science teachers. Saslow’s goal was to provide teachers with the means to create lessons that are not only engaging, but also cover necessary standards. Saslow’s site was efficient and easy to navigate. The fact that he is a science teacher was clearly communicated by the way he designed his page as it was very practical, without sacrificing valuable content. I believe he did a great job and that his audience would benefit from visiting his site.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorThe best teachers never cease to be students. Archives
December 2017
Categories |